Posts Tagged ‘compare health insurance’

Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield Rate Hikes

Tuesday, September 7th, 2010

Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield had rate increases approved by the California Department of Insurance.  Rate increases average 14% for Anthem Blue Cross and 19% for Blue Shield of California, although Anthem was hoping to get approval for rate increases up to 39%.  The public was outraged over those potential rate hikes so the government stepped in to regulate a lower increase.  Anthem is the largest health insurer in California for-profit, but their proposal for the rate increases was found to have accounting errors so it was withdrawn.

President Obama used Anthem’s proposed rate increases as an example of what is flawed in our health care system.  Consumers should save around $184 million with the lowered rate increases, according to the Department of Insurance.  When you compare health insurance increases by insurers like the nonprofit Blue Shield of California, the insurer says that they have no choice because they are paying that much money out to hospitals, doctors and others for claims.  Both insurers were found to follow the State’s rule that 70% of their income be used to cover actual medical treatment.  Anthem is required to give at least 30 days notice before increasing their customers’ policy costs.

Compare Health Insurance with New Medicare Option

Friday, August 20th, 2010

You have a new choice for Medicare plans in Alabama as of a few months ago.  According to a press release from Blue Cross Blue Shield of Alabama, “Alabamians Have Access to a New Medicare Select Plan.”  The Medicare C Plus plan has been available to eligible residents of Alabama ever since Medicare came about in 1966.  The new plan option, C Plus Plan F, covers even more than the original C Plus plan.

The added coverage with C Plus Plan F includes the Part B deductible of $155 and any emergency care outside of the United States that is deemed medically necessary.  It will also cover the $137.50 per day copayment in a skilled nursing facility for days 21-100.  Plan F does require all plan holders to pay their premiums for Medicare Part B.

The rising costs when you compare health insurance can be helped by these Medicare options.  Combining the C Plus Plan F with a prescription drug program from Medicare like Blue Rx will help protect consumers from unexpected medical costs.  You can also budget for your annual medical expenses better with a combination Plan F and Medicare Part D plan.  Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama is there to answer any consumer questions about this new Medicare option.

Illinois to Compare Health Insurance Rate Hikes

Saturday, August 7th, 2010

Regulators in the state of Illinois have asked for a $1 million federal grant and permission from lawmakers to help police health insurance companies.  They hope to receive permission to make the final decision on any rate increases requested by insurers.  With so many Illinois residents fighting to pay the bills when they compare health insurance costs, regulators believe that this step will help control the skyrocketing premiums charged by many companies.

In the past two years, Illinois has received 186 complaints about health insurance increases, some of which have been up to a 100% increase.  The insurance department hopes that receiving the federal grant will help the lawmakers agree to allow their oversight of insurers like Golden Rule Insurance.  Because of medical inflation and the recession, individual health insurance rates have just skyrocketed.  Insurers defend their rate increases and say that they really should be raising rates even higher.

At least 25 other states have the power to approve or deny rate increases by health insurers.  All health insurers in Illinois, such as Assurant Health, work for profit.  The state currently does not require them to give consumers notice of rate increases or restrict the premiums charged to individuals or large businesses.  Small businesses do have limited protection.  In their request for the government grant, Illinois regulators said that their current system just isn’t effective and they need the government’s money to improve their rate review system.

UPMC Health Insurance Could Suffer From Reform

Friday, July 30th, 2010

kill the billWhile the health care reform bill passed by President Obama means well, the state of Massachusetts has already tried something similar without much success.  According to The Washington Post article “As Massachusetts health ‘reform’ goes, so could Obamacare,” columnist Robert J. Samuelson doesn’t believe that Obama’s plans will do much to solve the health care crisis.  By putting caps on premium increases for companies like UPMC health insurance and other small and large insurers, it could easily put them out of business or into bankruptcy.

Massachusetts started by expanding the state-subsidized insurance coverage, but failed to get health care costs under control or make sure that people’s overall health actually is improving from this policy.  Currently, the federal government plan has begun the same way.  Most individuals in Massachusetts are required to compare health insurance coverage and purchase some form.  Middle class families earning too much to qualify for Medicaid but with incomes less than three times above the poverty level receive state subsidies.  Insurance coverage has increased from 87.5% of the (non-elderly) population in 2006 to 95.2% in 2009.

It’s hard to tell whether there has been any improvement in health since many uninsured people were young and healthy.  It will likely take many years to determine that.  But emergency rooms are still full, workers are taking home less pay because of their insurance costs, and less money is being spent on schools, police, prisons, roads, and more because of the increase in health care spending.  While ideas have come about to help decrease overall health care costs and spending, such as per-patient fees combining doctors to make treatments higher quality rather than quantity, nothing has had enough of a blueprint to actually be tried.  There is a dangerous possibility that this unchecked spending on healthcare will increase taxes and budget deficits and hardly show any health gains.

Compare Health Insurance Medigap Plans

Monday, July 12th, 2010

In the article “Ask Kim: The ABCs of the new Medigap plans,” Kimberly Lankford of Kiplinger’s Money Power explains the recent Medigap changes.  Two new Medicare supplement plans were introduced on June 1, Medigap plans M and N.  Plans E, H, I, and J will no longer be offered as Medigap plans.  Anyone who wants to keep their old plan, even those that have been discontinued, is able to do so with no changes.  It might be a good idea to compare health insurance options though, because the new plans offer lower premiums in exchange for some cost-sharing.

The new plans are both similar to Medigap’s most popular policy, Plan F.  The difference with Plan M is that it only covers half of the Medicare Part A deductible of $1,100 and does not cover any of the $155 Part B deductible.  While Plan N does cover the full Part A deductible, it has the added expense of co-pays for doctors visits ($20) and emergency room treatment ($50).  Medicare Part B “excess charges” are not covered by either Plan M or N.

More insurers like Golden Rule Health Insurance are offering Plan N than Plan M.  The cost is about 30% less than Plan F.  While you’ll be paying less for your policy, take into account the additional co-pays, Part B deductible, and any Part B “excess charges” you may have to pay out of pocket with Plan N before switching.  It might still work out to your benefit to change plans.  People eligible for the first time for Medicare Part B within 6 months will automatically qualify for Medigap plans.  Once that enrollment period ends, you could be disqualified for health conditions.  There are insurers offering Plans M and N regardless of health conditions though.

Individual Rate Hikes: Compare Health Insurance

Monday, July 5th, 2010

walgreens signIndividual health insurance rates have increased by as much as 20%, compared with employer-sponsored group plan increases closer to 5%.  In the Associated Press article “Survey: Individual health insurance premiums jump,”  Tom Murphy summarizes the results found in the Kaiser Family Foundation’s new survey.  Although individual insurance plans increased by 20%, consumers were able to compare health insurance rates at other providers causing many to switch.  Switching providers lowered the average price increase to 13%, still much higher than the employer-sponsored family plan increase of 5%.  Individual employer-sponsored plans stayed almost the same from year to year.

The individual health insurance market is used by 14 million or so Americans under the age of 65, while 157 million participate in employer-sponsored plans.  Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield of California came under fire last year for their request of 20% premium increases, but they argue that the increases are fully necessary.  All of these individual health insurance increases most likely added to the health care reform debate and the bill that was passed in March.  Almost half of the people surveyed purchase individual health insurance because they are self-employed or own small businesses.  We’ll see what the health care changes bring about for the individual market’s costs.

Infertility Insurance From Mercy Health Plans

Thursday, June 24th, 2010

statueLawmakers in the House and Senate are hoping to make it mandatory for insurance companies to cover infertility treatments.  In The Washington Times article “Insurance-plan coverage for infertility urged,” Cheryl Wetzstein says that Resolve: The National Infertility Association is pushing for the insurance coverage.  Florida Representative Debbie Wasserman Schultz is cosponsor of a bill requiring insurance companies to cover clients’ infertility treatments.  Fifteen states already require insurance companies like Mercy Health Plans to cover the treatment needed by 1 in 8 couples trying to conceive.  Maryland and West Virginia are two of the states that already have infertility coverage.

In the Senate, Kirsten Gillibrand of New York has a companion bill on the table.  Resolve is also hoping that the government will allocate $1 million for a “national action plan” on infertility, which the CDC is developing.  They want to learn more about what is causing infertility so that it can be detected and treated earlier.  With 7.3 million women struggling either to conceive or carry a pregnancy, it is important to compare health insurance offerings from state to state and see what can be done nationally with insurance.  Sexually transmitted diseases and simply waiting too long to have kids are some of the main culprits causing infertility.  The more that the topic is discussed by women dealing with it, the more lawmakers and insurance companies will be forced to deal with this pressing issue.

Compare Health Insurance with Dental

Thursday, June 17th, 2010

One-fourth of Americans do not have dental insurance, according to a U.S. News & World Report article.  In “1 in 4 Americans Under 65 Lacks Dental Insurance,” this survey from 2008 shows that race, employment, and even education all play a roll in whether Americans have dental coverage.  Compare health insurance with dental coverage and many people think dental is something they can cut back on to save money.  Unfortunately this leads to dental problems and other health issues since dental health is directly related to overall health.

This U.S. National Center for Health Statistics report was released last week and showed that having dental insurance is the main indicator of whether or not you receive regular dental care.  Eighty-percent of people who have employer sponsored health care had dental coverage included in that care.  Unfortunately, only thirty percent of those who had directly purchased their own insurance from a company like Golden Rule health insurance had included dental coverage.

Black Americans were more likely to have dental coverage than white Americans, Asian Americans, or Hispanic Americans.  People with less than a high school education only had dental insurance in forty percent of the cases studied.  Americans are more likely to have dental insurance as their income gets higher, along with most other types of insurance.  Taking care of your teeth, mouth, and gums is very important to your overall good health.  Search for dental insurance coverage to take care of you and your family.

High-Risk Pools: Compare Health Insurance Options

Wednesday, May 5th, 2010

All 50 states had to decide by April 30 whether they would run their own high-risk health insurance pools or have the government run them.  Florida has opted out of running their own high-risk pools, according to “Crist wants federal government to run high-risk health insurance pool,” by Fred Tasker of The Miami Herald. The Obama administration’s health care reform created these high-risk pools to compare health insurance options for those who cannot get insurance in the private market.  Americans with preexisting conditions such as cancer or diabetes will now be able to obtain health insurance from these high-risk pools, whether run by individual states or the federal government.

The Department of Health and Human Services will be in charge of all of the government run programs.  With 29 states opting to run their own high-risk health insurance pools, they’ll use a one-time government subsidy to help establish the programs.  Although Florida will receive $5 million of the total $351 million subsidy, Governor Crist says that he cannot commit any of Florida’s own resources to run this temporary high-risk pool.  Companies like Aultcare health insurance will work hard with their individual consumers to offer health insurance to everyone they can.  Those who still don’t qualify can look to the government pools.  Of course, politics seems to be working its way into which states opt to run their own programs and which do not.  Regardless of what the states decided, more Americans with preexisting conditions will be able to obtain health coverage.

Insurance Freeze From Fallon Health Insurance & Other MA Insurers

Wednesday, April 28th, 2010
Governor Deval Patrick

Governor Deval Patrick

The Wall Street Journal article “The Massachusetts Insurance Blackout” explains the fallout from Governor Deval Patrick’s price controls on insurance premiums.  Insurers are not selling small business and individual premiums because they say that the Governor’s rate cap will force them into huge losses.  This small-group market consists of 800,000 Massachusetts residents, many of whom will have to go without health care.  Fallon health insurance, Blue Cross Blue Shield, and Tufts Health Plan are three of the largest four insurers in the state.  All of them had operating losses in 2009 and say that this premium freeze will force another $100 million in losses this year.  All of the major health insurers in Massachusetts operate as non-profits and some are having their solvency threatened by this rate cap.

Governor Patrick says that this is his response to the greed that health insurance companies have shown.  The Boston superior court has heard an emergency case and is expected to make a decision soon.  State officials, however, are demanding the insurance companies go back to selling their policies at last years premiums.  The state’s Attorney General believes that the cost of health care in general is to blame for Massachusetts having the highest premiums in the nation.  He says that if you compare health insurance costs to the cost of the actual health care, the industry is not abusing its customers.  This debate in Massachusetts between political power for candidates and health care will likely happen all across the United States because of President Obama’s so-called ObamaCare.